As you read a friend of mine, humans use about 5% of our brain, and if we use 100% could even kill the mind, etc. to create a parallel universe.
To develop the brain to 100% would have to apply 8 intelligences:
* Linguistic intelligence. You have good editors and writers. Uses both hemispheres.
* Logical-mathematical intelligence. Which is used to solve problems of logic and mathematics, scientists. It has always been regarded as unique, so Gardner does not believe entirely in traditional intelligence tests.
* Spatial intelligence. Which allows us to think in three dimensions. Which are the sailors, surgeons, architects, sculptors, engineers or designers.
* Musical intelligence. We find singers, composers, musicians and dancers.
* Bodily-kinesthetic intelligence. The specially developed athletes, artisans, dancers, surgeons and, therefore is what allows the body to use for activities or solve problems.
* Intrapersonal intelligence. Allows us to know ourselves. Not associated with any particular activity.
* Interpersonal intelligence. Enterder allows us to others. Dominates vendors, politicians, teachers or therapists.
* Naturalist intelligence. We use when we observe and study nature to organize, sort and order, such as biologists and herbalists.
Here you something I found online:
How many of us have heard that phrase several times on television or in everyday life? Another major current fallacies and enduring nearly a century.
It is totally false that we only use 10% of our brain. Used 100%, yes, not simultaneously. (In fact, large seizures only when you can get to use 100% of the brain in unison). As happens to our muscles, we used brain regions depending on the activity we are doing. The greater complexity, greater use of the brain. The countless MRIs and CT scans have been done to study the electrical activity over decades to prove it. Perhaps one of the reasons that the myth arose was that some people twisted the statement that use 10% of our brain in a conscious way, while 90% is unconscious (in charge of tasks such as controlling the heart rate , intestinal peristalsis, dilation or contraction of the pupils, etc). At the end, all that and was upset as the myth now.
If the claim were true 10%, with the least brain injury result in death, and that's not true. When there is an injury, and if it is small, the adjacent areas of the region altered attempt to compensate for loss of function through a slow process of neuronal plasticity. Also, if we used only 10% would be plants or be dead. No one can live with that percentage of brain activity.
The origin of this myth is very diffuse. It is estimated that emerged from the early twentieth century. But despite all investigations, no one knows for sure what was the triggering event. Among the various hypotheses that are believed to handle scientific findings emerged misunderstood or misinterpreted by people who did not understand the field and was subsequently broadcast. The most famous people that helped to spread this myth were:
-Albert Einstein. Yes, the same! Even an intellectual as he had his mistakes and was not his campo.Allá neurology in the thirties, neurologists discovered that species with more complex nervous system (most notably men) spend a lower proportion of brain mass sensory-motor functions. The name was applied to silent cortex brain areas devoted to other activities, among which language and abstract thinking. The quiet title was mistakenly think some non-experts (like Einstein) that this part of the brain was empty.
-Dale Carnegie. In his popular book "How to Win Friends and Influence People" (How to Win Friends and Influence People) said that most people only use 15% of their brains. A self-help book that ended with establishing and myth.
"The myth of 10% is one of the arguments of the Cult of Scientology to recruit.
"Another argument used ad nauseum by proponents of the paranormal, defending telepathy, extrasensory powers and other neurological fantasies without any sense. They claim that if a large percentage of the brain that we use, the increased activity in special conditions it could cause all these paranormal events (ains, how much ignorance).
This is an example of what some call "Psycho" Done. " A belief that, although not supported by actual evidence, is taken as real because its constant repetition changes the way we experience life. The people who have more knowledge, know no more than repeat over and over again.
Sorry for using a simultaneous translator.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kV_YmfrbSxE&feature=player_embedded # at = 16
http://blogdejuanpardo.blogspot.com/2011/05/si-votas-cdl-tu-voto-vale-por-dos.html
Receives a greeting from Spain.